>----- Original Message -----
>From: sucrosemusic <sucrosemusic@...>
>
>> it's unlikely, but it could have been a crosslinked file..
>> scandisk/whatever your hard drive.
>
>hmm,
>never heard of that - i'll check into it
>i was running various scan disks over the weekend - it's a 17Gb drive so it
>takes about 4 hours each scan, and i could almost believe you...
>
>...but...
>
>...i've never recorded anything like that vocal onto my hard drive
>
>even if it were a crosslinked file, wouldn't the sample rate be comparable -
>i mean i've not dug deep into the file yet, but if it were twice the speed,
>it would have to have been recorded at 88.2Khz or thereabouts (maybe 96)
>this too is an impossibility on my disk
No, you have it mixed up!
If it was recorded at 22.05 KHz, and played at 44.1 KHz, then it
would be twice the speed/pitch, as you say it is.
I would put my money on the crosslinked file guess. It might be a
computer system sound, maybe speech for your OS or an application, or
something similar. For that sort of use, lower sample rate (and
sized) audio files are common.
Simon
Canberra
AUSTRALIA