Works for me, do I get a free one? ;-)
Barry
--- In motm@y..., "Thomas White" <djthomaswhite@h...> wrote:
> >How 'bout a MOTM Ouija controller?
>
> I think this is a FAT name for the controller. What better than to
relate communicating with another dimension through MOTM
than the Ouija referrence? This should be the name of our
ever-growing DIY controller project. All we need is to figure out
the various circuits we would like to see on a panel and get it
together next panel run. Anybody else interested. We can always
make more than one controller so what would all of you REALLY
NEED on a performance controller?
>
> Thomas White
>
> PS. MOTM-1000 OUIJA CONTROLLER? Or would it go in the
800 series with EG's and the like?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: coyoteous
> To: motm@y...
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:07 PM
> Subject: [motm] Re: OT and very very very bizarre !
>
>
> A voice from beyond the grave (oooooo...)
>
> http://www.vtf.de/
>
> datacult has a custom Modcan module (filter?) #13A to work
with
> this stuff (seriously). I think the Hafler Trio (Andrew McKenzie)
put
> out a recording along these lines, as well.
>
> How 'bout a MOTM Ouija controller?
>
> BOO!
>
> Barry
>
> --- In motm@y..., "sikorsky" <vulture.squadron@s...> wrote:
> > hello all,
> > okay, i've had a mobile phone locking onto a network print to
all
> 24
> > channels of an analogue tape, but can anyone explain this:
> >
> > i was working on a remix of a track ∗ on saturday, on my
> computer, and
> > recorded some drum loops
> > when i recorded them all i heard was drum loop - obviously
> > today i play them back and i get drum loop - spooky voice -
> drum loop
> > very very bizarre, so
> >
> > 1) there are only effected vocals on the song, but this is an
> english voice,
> > dry (not even a dash of reverb), saying "there hello"
> >
> > 2) at around twice the pitch / tempo of normal speech
> >
> > 3) i wasn't drunk / stoned / etc
> >
> > 4) there was absolutely nothing plugged into the console
that
> this could
> > come from
> >
> > 5) it wasn't taxi radio style induction as i would have heard it
> during
> > recording, and it's far far too clean for that
> >
> > 6) if it was a mobile phone, how could it be at twice the
> frequency
> >
> > 7) i isolated the section of recording, i can't tell at the start,
but
> at
> > the end of the interuption the waveform is clipped
> >
> > 8) no one else has keys to my house apart from my
girlfriend,
> and she
> > wouldn't have a clue how to boot my music computer, never
> mind alter the
> > file properties to make it look as though it hadn't been
> tampered with
> >
> > 9) what the hell is going on..?
> >
> > cheers
> > paul b
> > rather spooked
> >
> > ∗ and another spooky thing is that when i first heard this
band
> back at the
> > end of 99, i immediately said they reminded me of fad
gadget -
> whom they'd
> > never heard of - and i found out today that frank (tovey) died
last
> week
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.