> That sounds like overkill to me. Based on research papers
that I've read,
> and my own ears, 24/96 conversion doesn't sound any better
than 24/44.1
I tend to agree, but that wasn't my point. The idea was to get
20khz bandwidth and the bottom end of the control range - 192 at
the top, 96 in the middle, 48 at the bottom.
> This is true. There are many 16-bit converters that sound
better than
> 24-bit converters. While there is a noticeable difference
between 16-bit
> and 20-bit, the difference between 20-bit and 24-bit seems
insignificant.
Converters tend to come in increments of 8 bits these days.
> I have five digital delays, and four of them have voltage control.
It's a
> very common feature.
Can you name one that is still in production?
> However, none of them can pass DC, which is what I would
want in an motm
> digital delay module.
Now you're talkin', I suppose if it were for cv range only it could be
pretty cheap to make. Otherwise, that's where the "ghost
electronics" come in.
Barry