| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
Yes, I’d like one of these too, butwith better droop characteristics on the S&H and non-attenuated inputs forprecision capture of VCO control voltages.
John Loffink
jloffink@...
-----Original Message-----
From: jhaible@...[mailto:jhaible@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:40 AM
To: jwbarlow@...;motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] possible micromodule?
If you have several S&H's in one module it would only be consequentto
chain them like the Serge Analog Shift Register.(I have a circuit for something
like that.) Individual Signal inputs and clockinputs for each stage (to use
them as separate S&H's), but normalized to aAnalogue-Shift-Register chain.
JH.
jwbarlow@... schrieb:
> Sorry to interrupt the current discussion ofthe pros and cons of schematics.
>
> I was thinking today how nice it would be tohave several more sample and
> hold modules in any given system (I thinkit's an under appreciated and under
> utilized module). Though the 101s aren'texpensive at all, they only supply
> one S/H per module and some elaboraterandom/noise functions, of which one
> probably wouldn't need more than a few in anysystem.
>
> What I was thinking was a 1U module with sixjacks (S/H in, S/H out, external
> pulse in) and 3 knobs (2 S/H attenuators, andinternal clock rate) -- two
> independent basic S/H units sharing a commonclock which would be defeated by
> inserting a jack into the external pulseinput of each S/H.
>
> With this module and an 820 one could get theVC sample and hold that I had
> proposed a long time ago.
>
> JB