I would love to see an MOTM Analog Shift Register.
Would it be hard to just take the existing S&H design from the 101 and put
it 3 times on a PCB along with a small clock circuit? Seems like it would be
a real quickie module.
-----Original Message-----
From:
jhaible@... [mailto:
jhaible@...]
If you have several S&H's in one module it would only be consequent to
chain them like the Serge Analog Shift Register. (I have a circuit for
something
like that.) Individual Signal inputs and clock inputs for each stage (to use
them as separate S&H's), but normalized to a Analogue-Shift-Register chain.
jwbarlow@... schrieb:
> Sorry to interrupt the current discussion of the pros and cons of
schematics.
>
> I was thinking today how nice it would be to have several more sample and
> hold modules in any given system (I think it's an under appreciated and
under
> utilized module). Though the 101s aren't expensive at all, they only
supply
> one S/H per module and some elaborate random/noise functions, of which one
> probably wouldn't need more than a few in any system.
>
> What I was thinking was a 1U module with six jacks (S/H in, S/H out,
external
> pulse in) and 3 knobs (2 S/H attenuators, and internal clock rate) -- two
> independent basic S/H units sharing a common clock which would be defeated
by
> inserting a jack into the external pulse input of each S/H.
>
> With this module and an 820 one could get the VC sample and hold that I
had
> proposed a long time ago.
>
> JB