> Last night I tried different PW settings (with no PWM) and, without any
> timbre modulation I find I much prefer square waves -- richer, more full
> bodied (can't think of any more coffee metaphors at the moment). So I'm
> wondering if you tend to use one setting such that maybe a switch could
give
> you appropriate settings like SQUARE, 70%, and LEAD, or if the pot is
really
> worth it -- inquiring minds want to know.
>
> JB
Well, I think the pot is really worth it on the 300 when coupled with PWM
input. However, with Paul's latest suggestion for a tri and VARiable
output that shapes between a 50% square and saw for the 310, I have pushed
PWM control completely off my wish list. I think Paul's latest post hit
that last soft spot for having room for 310s in the system. That shaping
(although limited) that the 300 will not do. I don't need no stinkin' PWM
knob. Each voice could have one 310 and still sync up too.
LH