| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
>>>>OK, Jurgen wins.
--- In motm@y..., jhaible@t... wrote:
> IMO, the uLFO should not be a scaled down version
> of the big one, but something to complement it.
>
> So here's a completely different idea:
>
> What about an "Animation LFO" ?
> To breathe life into static patches, you need a lot of
> subtle modulation rather than the most exciting of
> waveshapes.
<<<<