Yes, Paul. These are indeed good thoughts. Although personally, I liked
the original idea of PWM control, that is already available on the 300.
This shaping between square and saw offers something not available on the
300. I would be happy to buy these 310s as long as the same great tracking
and stability of the 300 will carry over to this module. And, thanks for
stating the obvious concerning syncing with a 300 for those of us that may
have forgotten that the audio out of one osc can be used for the sync in of
another.
Larry Hendry
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> If I use the a dual OTA, triange-based VCO, then
> I can get SAW for a minimal effort.
> So, I'm thinking these lines:
>
> COARSE
> FINE
> +/- FM
> WAVESHAPE
> between SQUARE and SAW, this is a fader pot
>
> jacks are
>
> 1V/Oct FM
> TRI VAR
>
> I'm thinking this will fit (barely!) on the MOTM-800
> "form-factor" pcb. Still looking like $159 kit, $80
> less than a '300.
>
> Even though this VCO has no SYNC, you ∗can∗
> use it to drive SYNC into a MOTM-300.