Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] uVCO range poll

From: "sikorsky" <vulture.squadron@...>
Date: 2001-11-24

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>

> c) 0.5Hz to 30Khz

hello all,

i'd say "C" because any auxilliary VCO (such as this) is likely to replace
the main VCOs for such duties as creating beat frequencies, ring modulation
and upper harmonics. i think a lot of upper 'headroom' is essential. there's
also the argument about the uVCO's use as an auxilliary LFO and the need for
lower 'headroom' - but i'm not so bothered about that.
a final thought though - i think if the uVCO coarse (and fine..?) pot
'tracked' the same as the main VCO that would be more intuitive to use,
which i suppose points to a range of 0.125Hz to 150KHz
there's no reason whay the 'cheap option' shouldn't still stande head and
shoulders above the competition in every respect :-)

my 0.02 cents (that euro cents) - shit i've just realised i've a big jar of
assorted european coinage - and it's going to be worthless soon
cheers
paul b