> I've seen the same schematic. It's just a sequential timer -- the first
> timer sets the delay time, the second timer sets the length of the gate
> out. It does not preserve the pulse width of the incoming gate, in fact,
> it treats an incoming gate as a trigger -- completely ignoring the
trailing
> edge. As such, it should be called a trigger delay. Nor does it
recognize
> incoming triggers after the first timer is still armed.
hello all,
interesting, but since it's only going to cost around £2 in parts i'm going
to give it a go
then i can also learn how to buffer an LED properly...
cheers
paul b