Could not agree more! That's what's its all about - unleash the
floodgates and someone will find a unique application to use/abuse
the design.
That's totally the reason I went the modular route (plus the
immediacy of it) and I'd bet alot of other people on the list would
agree. If all I wanted was a standard selection of modules I'd have
decided on a simple monosynth with patch storage capabilities - much
smaller, much less expensive, and, arguably, more convenient. I'm
not saying I don't think some of the current modules don't have
unique features - I think they do. I'm just stating that you've got
a talented lot of thinkers w/ a different perspective on things and
whatever you throw at us we'll make the most of.
I do understand producing the standard lot from a marketing/sales
perspective but if we got one whacked out design for every 4 standard
modules I think we'd all be happy.
Viva MOTM and the MOTM Compatible family...
>> So don't worry about being musically useful. We'll make some music
with whatever you put out (perhaps with a pretty liberal definition
of the word "music"). I like being challenged to figure out how to
use a new module. For instance, I had no idea how I'd use a MiniWave
based on the descriptions from Wiard and Blacet. But I knew Grant and
John well enough to trust that it would be something cool, and got
one. Same with the Dark Star. And I trust your designs enough to know
that if you think a module's interesting, I will too! I know that
when I heard the 6-way ringmod demo, I was hearing sounds that I
wanted to make!