I hate "me too" posts... but what else is there to say?
Ideally I'd like the output to blend from TRI (-5v) to SAW (0v) to PULSE
(+5v), but its more important to me that there is a blend in general than
the range of the blend.
Once again, thanks for letting us give some input, Paul!
--PBr
-----Original Message-----
From:
jasret@... [mailto:
jasret@...]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:45 AM
To:
motm@yahoogroups.comSubject: [motm] Re: MOTM-310 time again
--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> The only other possibility is: the 4th pots is a 'blend'. The
> VCO has 1 OUT. The 4th jack is PWM IN. With no plug inserted,
> the PULSE is 50%. Else, the input is a -5V to +5V pulse width
> control (no input attenuation). So you can get SAW to PULSE
> with the blend. This is not as gnarly as the TRI
> stuff, and possibly more
> musically useful.
>
> Well??!?!?
I like this one. A single out for the ∗micro∗ VCO should be
sufficient (if it's used as a clock, you'll only need the
PULSE/SQUARE; if it's running a Miniwave, you'll only need the SAW;
if it's used as an audio oscillator, THEN the blend will be useful),
and I find a PWM ∗jack∗ more flexible than a PW knob (you can always
use an external CV source to set a fixed pulse width other than 50%).