Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: Moog ladder plan

From: jpotter@...
Date: 2001-08-23

Seconded! The more VC control the better. Something like what is
described below would be absolutely sick.

The MS-20 is still my current favorite filter, though - so much
character.

--- In motm@y..., Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@k...> wrote:
> > You obviously know much more about this than I do, but looking at
filters
> > as an end-user, it seems that existing filter designs may be
improved
> > significantly by adding new controls such as variable mode,
variable slope,
> > variable width, switchable feedback paths, VC resonance, etc.
> >
> I think Mark has made one of the best suggestions about filters
that I've
> seen in a while, especially from a user's standpoint. These would
all be
> very useful, IMHO. One of the things that appealed to me about
Serge
> before I decided to go MOTM was the Serge variable slope filter.
The
> 'feedback' input on the Oakley ladder filter is a very nice
option. VC
> control of the filter type on the anticipated motm SEM would be
very nice
> (as may already be in progress).
>
> Jeff