We're on all this, hee hee hee.
Paul S.
>
> It would have to be noticeably different, otherwise you are going to get
> all of these people complaining that it doesn't sound exactly like the
Moog
> filter. This is because the various Moog filters sound different, and no
> one "clone" can be made to sound exactly like all of them. Even Mini
Moogs
> vary amongst themselves. I'm guessing this due to the availability of
> different parts over the years or different tolerances in transistor
> matching when they were built. Nevermind the coloration of the VCA
> following the VCF when patching the Mini Moog as a "stand alone" filter.
>
> >Filters are based on mathematical polynomials. You aren't going to get a
> >'new' polynomial. What you get
> >are different ways to implement them. 95% of the time, it's the parts
> >themselves that make a difference.
>
> You obviously know much more about this than I do, but looking at filters
> as an end-user, it seems that existing filter designs may be improved
> significantly by adding new controls such as variable mode, variable
slope,
> variable width, switchable feedback paths, VC resonance, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>