> not to mention the fact that there are a number of other damn cool
> alternatives out there, e.g., fat controller, mobius, UEG, various doepfer
> goodies, 320/120 combo, etc...
>
> i don't believe i'm about to say this, but i don't think we ∗need∗ an motm
> sequencer... or at least there are a lot of modules we need ∗before∗ a
> sequencer...
Hmmm... I was fired up in my email about the sequencer (again). The MOTM
makes me so damn passionate.
If they do the round sequencer affordably, I will buy one. It is a unique
idea. It just needs thought out a lot better on a lot of fronts.
Does the MOTM need its own sequencer??? Definitely! SequencerS actaully.
I have a Mobius and 2 EUGs. Neither afford the functionality that the 3
sequencers Paul has suggested would provide. I am really into the barebones
MOTM sequencer at the moment; 8 step I believe.
--Shemp