I've been scratching my head over that one as well. It just seems to have
appeared in the discussion and I've been too self-conscious to be the first
one to hold up a finger and say, "excuse me, ∗huh?∗" ;-)
Analog voltages are... analog... so they always change in a continuous
manner... if you sum them in different ways, then you get a combined new
voltage... but that's as old as the hills, not "morphing" so... I'm lost.
How does the term "morphing" apply?
JH's "Interpolating Scanner" idea is the closest thing I've read about to
making changes to CVs that just might be considered morphing, because it
cordons off voltages at different levels, sort of adding a new "plane" to
the control. How does the proposed Dual VCA "morph" control voltages?
(Another question... several folks have expressed that having a VC Panner
will be the cat's meow and add radically new functionality to the MOTM. How
is this different from taking the + & - outputs from an '800 EG (for
example), and plugging one each into the conrtol inputs of the two VCAs in
the existing '110 module, then summing their audio outputs in a third module
(mixer, filter inputs, etc.). I feel like I'm missing something here, too.
Maybe I'm just old and slow... I'll be the first to admit it.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Pontius [mailto:
jpont@...]
Sent: Thursday, 12 July, 2001 10:35 AM
To:
motm@yahoogroups.comSubject: [motm] cv morphing?
After posting possible ideas for using the (hopefully next) dual vca
module at John Potter's request, he and several others have used the
phrase "cv morphing." Would someone kindly define "cv morphing"? I
haven't been able to locate the phrase in books, ... on synthesis that I
have.
Thanks, Jeff