To me, it makes more sense to replace the 120 front panel with a 120A (that
has an extra 4 holes for the individual outs) instead of adding a 1U
companion module, provided that the circuitry containing the buffer circuits
fits as a daughterboard within the 120 module space. A 1U companion module
that contains nothing but 4 jacks in my opinion would be wanting something
more in functionality to account for it's space requirement. Add some
mults, then you're getting somewhere.
The only downside to a 120A panel would be that you would now have a 120
panel that you didn't need. Maybe the stooge operation could be set up to
convert a 120 panel to a 120A?
George
> --- In motm@y..., endiendi@t... wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I read more carefully and I now understand that you still
> intended a 2U panel, anyway you may still consider the suggestion of a
> 1U companion module.
> Cheers Enrico
>
>
> > > 2. A MOTM-120A panel. The MOTM-120A would be laid out just like a
> > > 120, but would have 4 extra jacks in the top row position. These
> > > would support a mod bringing out all 4 sub octaves to their own
> > > buffered full amplitude outputs. The mod would mount on a
> > > daughterboard like the MOTM-800 output LED mod at my site.
> > >
> > > Yes? No? Maybe?
> > >
> > > Moe
<snip>