Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [motm] Future Stooge panels?

From: "Microtonal" <microtonal@...>
Date: 2001-06-30

> Moe wrote:
> > 1. A 1U panel with power switch and fuseholder, and 2 output jacks
> > for buffered +15v and -15v.
>
> Would this be used for power distribution to multiple cabinets? My target
> system is three cabinets, so I'm in the process of designing a power
system
> to support it. I plan on replacing the 900 with a +-15V 3A PowerOne.
Also,
> future modules may require +5V so I'm including a separate PowerOne for
that
> as well. Part of my concern is insuring that the star distribution system
> is maintained, for obvious reasons. I'm not sure if a single 1U panel
would
> handle all of the necessary functionality for multiple cabinets. I've
> picked up 1U and 2U blanks to play around with specifically for this
> purpose. I would definitely go for stooge power panels over my own
designs
> provided they supported multi-cabinet properly.
>

This is a don't care for me, as any cabinet I build will be large enough to
consume the power from a good sized power supply.

> Moe wrote:

> > 2. A MOTM-120A panel. The MOTM-120A would be laid out just like a
> > 120, but would have 4 extra jacks in the top row position. These
> > would support a mod bringing out all 4 sub octaves to their own
> > buffered full amplitude outputs. The mod would mount on a
> > daughterboard like the MOTM-800 output LED mod at my site.
> >
> > Yes? No? Maybe?
>
> Yes!

We must think alike. I've been considering for awhile how useful discrete,
unfiltered outputs from the MOTM-120 would be. I would take the outputs
from the 74HC157 MUX so the outputs could be selectable between suboctave
and cross. The cross (AND function) could be useful for unusual triggering
modification, and add something different than the upcoming VC Pulse Divider
module.

John Loffink
microtonal@...