Hey Larry?
How about a dual attenuator mod kit ? : )
Jim
Microtonal wrote:
> Putting mults on the VC LFO would be very useful. That's usually where I
> need them. For instance, I may use the pulse output to drive the gates on
> my envelope generators.
>
> The VC Lag has room for a 6 jack mult, but I suspect it may be awhile before
> that module is respun. I'd like to do a review on the VC Lag once I explore
> it further. My timbre modulator patch shows that it is useful for more
> functions than just control voltage processing. Nice job JH!
>
> Other simple functions such as attenuator, simple mixer or DC bias source
> would be nice, but remember that every pot/knob added to the module probably
> adds $6-$10 in price. Also, mults could be added without effecting the PCB,
> the others could not.
>
> These things become more important as your MOTM system keeps growing and you
> begin running out of room for expansion.
>
> John Loffink
> microtonal@...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tentochi" <tentochi@...>
> To: "MOTM Mailing List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 8:06 PM
> Subject: [motm] LFO ('320) FP Wasted Space...
>
> > I know Dave Fulton has used the extra space for attenuaters. Good move!
> >
> > I also have heard of a couple of other people adding mults to the extra
> > (wasted) space. Also an excellent (and easy to implement) idea!
> >
> > Paul, in the next version of the LFO ('321???), could you add something to
> > the free, available space? This would be a great addition to the module
> and
> > help use the space more efficiently.
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Shemp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/