Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [motm] And now for something completely different.......

From: David Bivins <dbivins@...>
Date: 2001-03-05

Amen! Don't push back the VCA!!! You know I decided against buying a second
110 at this point because of the looming dual VCA(s), Paul. I need it bad. I
got a hankerin' for it. I gotta VCA jones.

I mean, I'd get more 110s if they were 1U wide and didn't have the damned
ring modulator. ;)

Timbre distortion... feh! I have several--the 120, the 820, the 100... The
120 is obvious. Run audio through the 820 really hard. Run audio through the
100 and clock it with a fast LFO.

NP: The Wedding Present - Dalliance (not an analog synth in sight, but this
Albini-recorded stuff has plenty of timbral distortion!)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Vehorn [mailto:ben@...]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:04 AM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
>
>
> I need more VCAs but was holding out for the dual model.
> Please don't push
> it back!
> --Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 5:42 PM
> To: MOTM listserv
> Subject: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
>
>
> Shemp stuffing LEDs up his nose.
>
> Since I still have about 38 MOTM-110 VCAs left, and sales are
> sort of slow
> (about 7 a month)
>
> So.....
> after the, 101, after the 830....
> anybody want to see a Voltage-controlled Timbre Distortion module?
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/