Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: MOTM

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: RE: [motm] Battle over

From: "Tentochi" <tentochi@...>
Date: 2001-03-05

I like the version with the 3X2 and 6X1 switch. Excellent for live
performance IMHO. It looks cool on Moe's mock-up too!

--Shemp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 3:14 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] Battle over
>
>
> Thanks for all the Mixer suggestions. Here is the "final" decision:
>
> a) Mixer model is 830, as in MOTM-830
>
> b) Moe inage #1 is the design: a bias switch, and a switched jack. The
> reason I like the
> jack is that it minimizes wiring, and is sort of slick, imho. I
> don't see a
> need for switches/LEDs
> as certainly you know if a patchcord is plugged into OUT 1 or not.
>
> And if you want to play reconfiguration games 'on-the-fly-, look at the
> MOTM-700. That's what it's for :)
>
> c) Now, since I am ∗assuming∗ that 95% of the time, this is an
> audio mixer,
> then I propose that
> the D/E/F inputs (the right column) all 3 be log pots. The reason
> they have
> to be over there is that
> the are pcb mounted. Then on the left column, these are 100K Bourns panel
> pots and A is normal and
> B & C are reversing attenuators. You want reversing atenuators to
> be linear,
> anyway!
>
> Well?
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>