I'll see if it fits mechanically. And, in it's current position the BIAS pot
is pcb mounted. Less wire, less labor.
Paul S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Microtonal" <microtonal@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Battle over
> Well, not to be nitpicky, but I would want the bias pot to be on the left
> column and mixer, since that side is more likely to be used with control
> voltages (linear pots and reversing attenuator).
>
> I would definitely like to have log pots on the right side mixer.
>
> John Loffink
> microtonal@...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 2:13 PM
> Subject: [motm] Battle over
>
>
> > Thanks for all the Mixer suggestions. Here is the "final" decision:
> >
> > a) Mixer model is 830, as in MOTM-830
> >
> > b) Moe inage #1 is the design: a bias switch, and a switched jack. The
> > reason I like the
> > jack is that it minimizes wiring, and is sort of slick, imho. I don't
see
> a
> > need for switches/LEDs
> > as certainly you know if a patchcord is plugged into OUT 1 or not.
> >
> > And if you want to play reconfiguration games 'on-the-fly-, look at the
> > MOTM-700. That's what it's for :)
> >
> > c) Now, since I am ∗assuming∗ that 95% of the time, this is an audio
> mixer,
> > then I propose that
> > the D/E/F inputs (the right column) all 3 be log pots. The reason they
> have
> > to be over there is that
> > the are pcb mounted. Then on the left column, these are 100K Bourns
panel
> > pots and A is normal and
> > B & C are reversing attenuators. You want reversing atenuators to be
> linear,
> > anyway!
> >
> > Well?
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>