I vote for speed.
--
James Holloway
jimh54@... - email
(972) 993-2023 x1188 - voicemail/fax
---- "Tony Karavidas" <
tony@...> wrote:
> One more issue I've been working on is the switch bounce. I have found
> an
> implementation that doens't penalize the response to the leading edge
> of a
> trigger, BUT it does limit the repetition rate of the GATE.
> For example, if I use 5mS dead time on the rising and falling edge
> of the
> switch, the input GATE is limited to just under 100Hz. This isn't a
> problem
> when it comes to using the UEG as an envelope generator. It takes over
> 60mS
> just to complete all the stages so most likely your input gate repetition
> would be slower than 60mS. If you try to input a faster gate, you simple
> start to chop off the final stages. The issue is with GATED-STEP mode
> (sequencer). Without any debouce code, I can take the UEG up to about
> 450Hz
> input, and it runs fine all day.
>
> So I need more feedback: Would you like a little debounce is exchange
> for
> some gate speed, or screw the debounce switch stuff (since you hardly
> use
> the switch) and keep the speed?
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now!
http://www.onebox.com