On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:34:03 +0200, Mycroft2152 <
mycroft2152@...>
wrote:
> Stefan.
> I think you finally got my point. There are many ways
> to homebrew pcbs. Some people have more success with
> one method or type of equipment than another. Everyone
> has different budgets and availibiltiy of parts.
> Everyone has their own special requirements. There is
> no one single best method.
> The purpose of a moderator in a group is to foster
> open discussion of the different methods availible.
> Not heavy handedly forcing their own ideas as best.
> Personally, I hope everyone can find a successful
> method to homebrew their pcbs, whether it is singles
> of mini production runs. I know I have.
> The Chicken Grill Motor Saga is finished.
> Myc
Well, then you should probaly think if you should call other methods
better if you probably haven't tried either of them.
Neither me nor you is a mod. Steve does not usually need to direct any
discussion.
I can voice my opinion that the fuser and chicken grill motor is a good
combination as often as i like, just as others can suggest the H200 as
often as they want. (when relevant and within reason of course). You claim
to understand that there are many right ways, and yet you distaste my
chicken grill motor for some reason and i get the impression you would
prefer i didn't mention it. I will not discuss it with you any more - in
that aspect the CGM saga is over for you, but do not think i will not
suggest it again in the future when the question comes up. In that aspect
the CGM motor is no more finished than the H200.
I really do not have time for this.
ST