All,
I have used both Eagle and Diptrace. I started with Eagle lo000ong ago and then switched over to Diptrace.
Neither one is a bad choice. I however prefer Diptrace. I have seen it mentioned that Eagle has a larger symbol base.
this use to bother me when I could not find the right symbol. (if it even existed) I now just draw up my own.
it was a bit tough in the beginning. But now I can draw anything I will ever need and pretty fast.
I give Diptrace my THUMBS UP!
Ill leave this by saying again. Their are no wrong choices.
You will one get out what you put in.
Sam
I spent about a 1 1/2 years with eagle, then a friend turned me on to diptrace and in about 4mos I was running at about the same speed I was with eagle. Another friend does this stuff for a living and I have had the chance to use Altium and I still feel diptrace is, out of those 3, the most intuitive software for my way of thinking. The only issue is so much stuff is already out in eagle, but no worries as diptrace gives you ulps for both schematic & board layout, and the work very well. I Hope this helpsd use diptrace but learn enough about eagle to be able to convert to diptrace.
Hope this helps you out :)
---In
homebrew_pcbs@yahoogroups.com, <synfinatic@...> wrote:
Diptrace is easy to learn and pretty powerful. I definitely found it easier to learn then Eagle. In the end though, I ended up switching to Eagle because it has a much larger library of components and has become a defacto standard with the Arduino community. Eagle is definitely more powerful then Diptrace.
I never tried DesignSpark. KiCad never worked properly on my OSX box.