On 23/08/12 12:49, Robin Whittle wrote:
> For small boards, I wonder if anyone has explored placing the board in a
> well-sealed, clear glass or plastic food container, or perhaps something
> more elaborate, half-filled with etchant, and then having some vigorous
> shaking or rotating arrangement.
>
> I think one of the benefits of the spray approach is that it
> preferentially erodes the copper which is directly exposed, without so
> much undercutting of the copper under the edge of the photoresist.
>
> I guess shaking, tumbling or ultrasonic agitation would not have this
> directional effect.
>
> As I mentioned in a post an hour or so ago, muriatic acid (HCl) may
> allow greater visibility of the board, which would help in a clear
> container which used shaking, turning over etc. rather than spraying.
> However, Edinburgh Etch (ferric chloride and citric acid) is claimed not
> to leave any residue, thereby (I guess) reducing the need for agitation
> or spraying.
>
> I am currently using a sponge with Edinburgh Etch.
Circulation would still be good to carry away saturated chelated citric acid.
I think an air-exposed system of etchant dripped or sprayed onto the pcb and
rotating sponge rollers would be the fastest setup. The airation should help
creating a copper-chloride etchant. I'd add some HCl to aid that process and see
if it works.
The rollers are just to create fast fluid movement withing microns of the
surface, which is otherwise slow due to laminar flow.