On 14/02/2012 11:21, Vicent Colomar Prats wrote:
> What size are the pads? I will try to do it in Eagle (I do not know it
> can import .pcb). I think there is no need to do it as an octogonal,
> as other user suggested, there is a simpler way, you can copy the
> figure and rotate it 45º, so you have an orthogonal (the original) and
> a diagonal one (the one you rotated 45º). Then you can check
> differences between both.
Of course! That's an easier way to do it. They could both be processed
at the same time, with smaller patterns.
Leon
--
Leon Heller
G1HSM