1. Yes, that's the one.
2. I wouldn't say "much better" but almost, or 'as' well, if the toner is heavy enough. And, once it has transferred the tracks don't seem to 'wash off' as easily as the Pulsar.
3. Also, if the toner is heavy enough, at least for me, it comes off in one piece (to flimsy to reuse) and leaves minimal residue. It does leave some residue, which the Pulsar does not, but it doesn't seem to be enough to interfere with etching.
and 4. Best of all, it doesn't seem to stretch as much as the Pulsar so automated drilling can be used.
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "kbshankar2000" <kbshankar2000@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> 1. To confirm, were you talking about this paper http://www.staples.com/office/supplies/StaplesProductDisplay?&storeId=10001&catalogId=10051&partNumber=633215
>
> 2. You seem to notice that it transfers much better than the Pulsar paper?
>
> 3. This paper however, might need to be soaked longer, but does come off in once piece leaving behind minimal residue?
>
> I had made one more post today including a Staples offer that had more information : maybe it will take some more time to appear on this group.
>