The fact that you are unlikely to get consensus on any of your question
should be an indication that there is a fairly wide tolerance involved
here. Here is my 2c:
1. Cleaning - The rule I learnt 30 years ago when I first did this is
that you want a 'wettable' surface, i.e. when you hold the board under a
tap, the water should evenly cover it, and not bead up. How you get to
that point is up to you, but generally scouring powder, fine wet & dry
sandpaper (400grit or higher) or 3M pads will all get the job done.
Wiping down with some degreasing solvent (alcohol, acetone etc) is
entirely optional.
2. Toner transfer is definitely the easier method ∗if∗ you have hot
roller laminator and ∗if∗ it gets hot enough. You'll generally know when
you have done enough passes because the paper will stick. Find a paper
that works for you, you can get by without the specialty toner transfer
paper. I use heavyweight brochure paper simply because I have some, but
most glossy magazine paper will work as well.
3. If you want better resolution, go photoresist, but bear in mind,
there a far more variables, e.g density of your transparencies, exposure
time, developer strength etc., and if you buy presensitized pcb, your
mistakes can be costly (though you can use your failures for toner transfer)
synchronousmosfet@... wrote:
>
> Guys, thanks very much, I appreciate the feedback.
>
> I can definitely see some mistakes I've been making with the transfer
> method...it really surprised me to find out from several of you that 8
> passes are sometimes needed, it honestly didn't occur to me that
> additional passes would make any difference.
>
> I have to make a fundamental decision...whether to try yet again to
> make the toner transfer method work....I mean, I DO have all the
> stuff, the special paper, the green film, the laminator, etc., etc.,
> ...and just get CRAZY about cleaning boards, using solvent, doing a
> zillion passes, etc., and WORKING on the process until I finally get
> it to work RIGHT....
>
> ....or to go straight to the photoresist method. I realized in writing
> this I accidentally lied...I had forgotten that even though I did buy
> an exposure setup and photoresist boards, etc., I never tried using
> that method...because the cost of those photoresist boards seemed too
> high to me.
>
> So....go crazy on the toner transfer method until I get it RIGHT, or
> go with photoresist and accept the higher cost of the boards....
>
> Any consensus on this?
>
> Very Best, Charlie
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>