Consensus is off topic on this list. ;-)
If you only need single sided board with limited resolution
requirements (say 8 mil or something) toner transfer is a good option.
It is cheaper and in my opinion less work than photoprocess.
ST
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:29 PM,
<
synchronousmosfet@...> wrote:
> Guys, thanks very much, I appreciate the feedback.
>
> I can definitely see some mistakes I've been making with the transfer method...it really surprised me to find out from several of you that 8 passes are sometimes needed, it honestly didn't occur to me that additional passes would make any difference.
>
> I have to make a fundamental decision...whether to try yet again to make the toner transfer method work....I mean, I DO have all the stuff, the special paper, the green film, the laminator, etc., etc., ...and just get CRAZY about cleaning boards, using solvent, doing a zillion passes, etc., and WORKING on the process until I finally get it to work RIGHT....
>
> ....or to go straight to the photoresist method. I realized in writing this I accidentally lied...I had forgotten that even though I did buy an exposure setup and photoresist boards, etc., I never tried using that method...because the cost of those photoresist boards seemed too high to me.
>
> So....go crazy on the toner transfer method until I get it RIGHT, or go with photoresist and accept the higher cost of the boards....
>
> Any consensus on this?
>
> Very Best, Charlie
>