> AdamS wrote:
>
> Yes, cheap and easy are the two words I
> had in mind when pondering on the idea
> of a homebrewed photoplotter. The
> dedicated photoplotter film was a bit
> pricey from memory, but worse was the
> $1000 odd minimum order quantity for me
> (in Australia). I didn't shop around
> and I cant remember who I called, may
> be it was Kodak ?
>http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.
>jhtml?pq-path=2608/2610/4131&pq-locale=
>en_US
Yep RED7 was the film I was looking at.
And the 1000$ AUD is a bit of a steep
price of entry. But I Think it might
be worth it even if you can't find a
friendly person to give it to you 10
sheets at a time.
It's just comical that the cost of
consumables will exceed the cost of
hardware 10:1
> The most accurate drive mechanism
> will be a stepper motor and a toothed
> belt drive combined with a linear
> optical encoder. Better than 20um
> resolution should be possible.
Yep - have all those parts sitting in
the garage just waiting.
My only concern is if sticktion is
going to cause a problem.
Time will tell.