I used a IIID for a while.
Did work well with HP toner, the cheap remanufactured one wouldn't.
Switched to a 600 DPI printer because the IIID wouldn't do the 0.5mm QFN
packages too well.
Anyone gutting a II or III HP with good paper pickup rollers - let me know
;-)
ST
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:17:48 +0100, Henry Carl Ott <
carlott@...>
wrote:
> I use an LJ-III all the time with pretty good success. All different
>
> transfer papers over the years
>
> It has the same print engine as the II, so I should expect pretty much
>
> the same results.
>
> The LJ-II does not have resolution enhancement, so perhaps it might not
>
> be quite as good on really fine lines (< 10mills), but you are likely to
>
> have issues with very fine details on ANY 300 dpi printer like the
>
> LJ-II/III. That said, I've still done some really hairy fine pitch smd
>
> successfully.
>
>
> I do experience the standard problem with filling very large contiguous
>
> black areas. No big deal.
>
>
>
>
> carl