On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:29:53 +0100, wbblair3 <
wbblair3@...> wrote:
> Just for the heck of it, I'm going to try turning the irons upside
>
> down and placing a black-anodized 80486 low-profile heat sink along
>
> with some silcon heatsink compound in the center of their "hot sides"
>
> to try and get a better idea of their _actual_ temperatures without
>
> having it so skewed by emissivity error. If I don't reach 392F there,
>
> I'll move the heatsink to the hottest portion of the iron(s) and try
>
> again.
>
>
> Bill
>
Please go and get a _simple_ thermocouple thermometer. It's even cheaper
than the optical ones. You will be much happier with something that
actually reads the temperature and not a random number.
Accept it, optical thermometers are just another useless but popular thing
to sell to "the silly sheep" and no good for measuring a wide variety of
surfaces.
ST