> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "smwither2002" <smwither2002@y...> wrote: > > I recorded a pattern at 2 bpm (extreme ambience) and although I > > repeatedly saved it at that tempo, every time I call it up it's > > at 4 bpm. Is that the slowest it will save? Not a real > > impediment, just curious about the limitations of this > > remarkable machine. > To test this . . . I then started aftering files, saving them, and > looking at them with E-Loader's midi file listing utility. > > More to follow. > > Dr. Steve I am now sorry I tried to figure out what was going on here. I found out much more than anyone probably needs to know. But, since I was checking out the problem, here are my results. A pattern I had saved previously had track 0 data [midi meta events] including tempo as expressed as a usecPerTick. With E-Loader, I was trying to see what was going on with the usecPerTick value at low bpm values. But, unless I'm mistaken, something is up with the way the file is stored and/or saved in OS2.0. I was unable to view this parameter after patterns were resaved. When I downloaded my previously saved pattern to the E-Mu, changed just the name, and uploaded it to the computer, E-Loader no longer displayed the same track 0 data. I also saved an unaltered pattern. That, too, appeared different in E-Loader after being saved. It may be that a change in the file structure in OS2.0 doesn't correspond with how E-Loader1.1 parses the file. So far as I can see the note and other channel data is still in the file. Its just that something about the way the midi track header is stored/viewed seems to be different in OS2.0. Another test I did consisted of starting a track at 4 bpm and editing the conductor track so that at 001.01.002 the tempo would become 1 bpm. The 1 bpm setting stayed with the pattern in memory until powerdown/reboot. Then the 1 bpm became 6 bpm. Who knows why this happens. My guess is that there some sort of mathematical calculation going on with the tempo/usecPerTick variable and during some operations (save/powerdown), the value gets checked or recalculated. This is just a guess. If someone knows, I'd be curious to know what's going on. Based on this, I don't think I will be using such a rate (2 bpm). ======Excerpt # 1 ================================= file name: "P.0.006-Smoover.mid" length: 2972 last modified: Tue Jun 24 00:06:14 EDT 2003 format: 1 numTracks: 17 ppqn: 384 msPerTick: 1.3020833333333333 track 0 start. length: 157 bytes 0: sysex type: 0 length: 72 f0 18 0f 7f 55 01 20 01 04 06 00 02 04 2e 00 03 04 40 00 04 04 00 00 05 04 05 00 06 04 0a 00 07 04 0c 00 08 04 07 00 09 04 00 00 0a 04 00 00 0b 04 00 00 0c 04 0f 00 0d 04 3c 00 0e 04 0a 00 0f 04 05 00 10 04 0a 00 f7 0: seqname: "Smoover #5" 0: smpteoffs: 96:0:0:0.0 0: tempo: 335195 usecPerTick 0: marker: "Main Channel Dests: bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" 0: timesig: 4/4 clksPerMetronome: 24 32ndsPerQuarter: 8 12288: endoftrack 0 track 1 start. length: 104 bytes 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 7 val: 127 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 10 val: 64 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 79 val: 0 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 80 val: 2 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 0 val: 17 0: cntrllr ch: 0 ctl: 32 val: 0 0: progchg ch: 0 val: 35 0: instname: "MP-7" 0: trackname: "Clav" 1410: noteon ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 120 1522: noteoff ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 0 4482: noteon ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 120 4602: noteoff ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 0 7554: noteon ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 120 7673: noteoff ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 0 10626: noteon ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 127 10738: noteoff ch: 0 key: 46 vel: 0 11265: noteon ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 70 11393: noteon ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 120 11416: noteoff ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 0 11416: noteoff ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 0 11524: noteon ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 111 11712: noteoff ch: 0 key: 36 vel: 0 12288: endoftrack 1 track 2 start. length: 72 bytes === Excerpt # 2 ================================== file name: "P.0.006-Smoover.mid" length: 2956 last modified: Tue Jun 24 00:14:04 EDT 2003 format: 1 numTracks: 17 ppqn: 384 msPerTick: 1.3020833333333333 track 0 start. length: 149 bytes 0: seqname: "Smoover #5 3072: noteoff ch: 7 key: 60 vel: 0 3074: noteon ch: 7 key: 48 vel: 115 3305: noteoff ch: 7 key: 48 vel: 0 3458: noteon ch: 7 key: 51 vel: 106 3682: noteoff ch: 7 key: 51 vel: 0 3842: noteon ch: 7 key: 53 vel: 115 4050: noteoff ch: 7 key: 53 vel: 0 4098: noteon ch: 7 key: 51 vel: 62 4146: noteoff ch: 7 key: 51 vel: 0 4225: noteon ch: 7 key: 55 vel: 115 4417: noteoff ch: 7 key: 55 vel: 0 4487: ptchbnd ch: 7 val: 260 4495: ptchbnd ch: 7 val: 520 4503: ptchbnd ch: 7 val: 780 =============================================
Message
Re: 2 bpm
2003-06-24 by steve_the_composer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.