Oh, I definitely agree it would be better to have real time mutes, don't
get me wrong! :) I was just telling him that you don't ahve to edit your
patterns to make them shorter in song mode, albeit as long as you don't
mind using the first bar of the pattern every time :)
rEalm
"jesse_medway <medway808@...>" <medway808
01/06/03 01:39 PM
Please respond to xl7
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
cc:
Subject: [xl7] Re: realtime track mutes recording in song mode
Sure but what if you wanted the kick to come out on the
second measure? If you just make a 2 measure pattern
then start it again with the kick out then the whole
pattern has to start from the 1 again, not good if you
have something like an 8 measure pattern and you want
tracks coming in and out during that one loop. Better
to just have real time mute record. They could be stored
as an event in the song track and there could be a setting
telling whether or not they have priority over the normal
mutes.
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> You don't have to, you can specify a shorter pattern length for
each Song
> Step. So if you have an 8 bar pattern, you can specify that it
should
> only play the first bar before going to the next pattern step.
>
> rEalm
>
been removed]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] Re: realtime track mutes recording in song mode
2003-01-07 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.