Yeah- what Aaron said- the XL7's synth engine is far beyond a "ROMpler"- I've owned lots of synths, and not in a collector fashion- (including a VirusA and a VirusC) and I don't feel like I'm missing much by not having them anymore- IMO they didn't do anything for me that my SQ-80 couldn't do (or JUNO-6/60/etc), which is 80s tech- Sure there's the polyphony and inputs but eh... It's a Virtual Analog, and a good one- but therein its limitations are defined- so why not just get a real one for 1/5 the price? I've spoken many times with the guy who programmed the DSP in the Virus, and actually contributed some distortion algorithms to him, but I still am able to say that it just didn't do it for me. I'm one of the most ardent "CD VS Vinyl - you're an idiot" proponents (on the CD side) but at the same time, an SQ-80, a Juno, SH101, TB303- these just sound different, in a way that the Virus (or Nord or whatever) has not yet achieved. I can't explain it- neither can you. Different strokes for different folks- But since you've got a spare rack space, I'll talk about synths I miss- Waldorf Microwave XT - GOD in a box. (for rack mounting, you'll just want the Microwave-II) After hitting the "randomize" button, I've heard things come out of that that I couldn't comprehend- Uhm- the Kawai K5K was a good one too- I picked one up on the GC blowout many years ago for those that remember- Careful with that Reso knob- Hmm what else- I think if I had to choose one synthesizer to sell someone on that was looking at a Virus (assuming you don't need all the gay computer integration). there is only one- and it's made by Dave Smith: http://www.davesmithinstruments.com/products/per/index.php Christ- I'm talking like an old guy- -SS On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Aaron Eppolito wrote: > You can go pretty far with the XL-7 as a pseudo-analog synth. What > you'll miss: hard sync, ring mod, FM, really fast LFOs, self- > resonant filters, live input. You can get PWM in the XL-7 by > messing with the SLoop parameter, sorta do hard sync (albeit at a > pretty slow rate) with SRetrig, and the realtime Q you can do with > enough layers as I described a long time ago (one layer with low Q, > one with high, RT control is via volume on the high-Q layer). > > People who dismiss the P2k engine as a "ROMpler" are missing out on > some of the really cool stuff you can do in the patchcord section. > (not dissing you in any way; on the contrary, I applaud you for > thinking to use it in a more synth fashion!) > > The Virus is a cool synth and does have features that you simply > won't get in the XL-7. That said, you can get pretty close (not > necessarily worse, mind you, just different) for a majority of > sounds and will certainly be able to make a ton of sounds a VA > simply can't. > > It's a tough choice. I don't think you can go wrong with a Virus, > but you might want to spend some time programming a patch or two in > a VA style in the XL-7 before you decide to drop coin! > > -Aaron > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Atom Smasher <atom@...> > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:54:21 AM > Subject: [xl7] virus vs xl7? > > i have an empty space in my rack, and it's calling to me... one of the > things that i though about filling it with is a virus-rack. > > i haven't yet explored the synth engine of the xl7, and it'll be a few > weeks at least before i have a chance to dig around in it, so.... is > anyone here a current or former virus owner? how does the xl7 compare? > > right off the top, the virus is ostensibly a virtual analog synth, > and the > xl7 seems more like a rompler. but i'm wondering if i could use some > "basic" waveforms, a few layers, some virtual patch-cords, and some > midi > CC controllers and roll my own virtual analog patches...? i'm > confident > that i can get good sounds out of it, but can it compete with a > virus on > the the merits of the virus? > > i only have one ROM slot in my xl7 filled, and i think it's the XL > ROM. > > > -- > ...atom > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [xl7] virus vs xl7?
2008-07-25 by Scott Solmonson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.