Agh! If you know BASIC synth theory you can easily understand the manual and program the XL-7, I mean, programming the XL-7 is so very very simple compared to many other synths. Why do you think people get synths like the Nord Modular? Effects? Why do you need them inside a synth? Just plug the XL-7 into some external effect processors. And oh, btw I like the XL-7 sounds as well. But I try to explain why programming is so much more important than effects. I care about programming. It's important in order to shape a sound the way you want. And if it wasn't for the programming, I would never get the XL-7. If you don't understand or care about programming, you can always find some cheap sound modules to plug in your midi setup. //Nifflas --- In xl7@y..., "heinrich22001" <hhuent@g...> wrote: > I´m curious, what you think about that: > > I was travelling by train last weekend and took the chance to read > through the manual, that means: the programming section. I only did > very basic sound tweaking, altered the factory stuff a little, never > needed indepth programming. So I studied this chapter to find what my > mp-7 can do for me. > > I was a little "shocked" by the endless possibilities. And I know I´m > never gonna use it. After reading it I felt like "damn, you need to > be an engineer to use the real strengths of this machine". Unlike > somebody else in this group I do not think this chapter is well > written. Parts are simply overexplained but then again an overview > and working examples are missing. > > I remember a market research study saying that most synthi users are > tweaking their own sounds way less than you might think. If I took my > limited time to compose songs and die care about all theses features > I would never end up with a finished song (I am no pro, don´t have a > studio, I only use my gear in late evenings - if my girl friend lets > me, that is ;-))) > > So my question is: Why did EMu put so much effort in sound fiddling > possibilities and offer such a limited effect section? An extended > but easy to use efx section is what most users are after, I guess. So > do I. How many of you are really (!) working with the programming > features of the XX-7? Maybe this is the way to go for minimal, > industrial, techno. But R & B??? > > No offence, just a question. > > HEinrich
Message
Re: Unbalanced features? Pro soundfiddling, ltd. efx. ??
2002-02-18 by nifflas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.