Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 22:28 UTC

Message

REPLY TO MIKEXL7

2002-02-06 by argomax2002

Mikexl7 said:

<< It only took me a couple of days to get my head around this 
simple setup. With the level of expearence you are boasting I am 
suprised  that you would say that.> > 
My level of experience goes proportionally inverse with my level 
of time available, dude.

<<One of the main reasons i bought this box it the extra outs and 
the aftertouch pads. >>
Fine; I honestly couldn't find a single application for them. Let's 
run a poll: aftertouch pads or graphic display?

<<I will now totaly flame you for telling me what I wan't in my 
gear. >>
You shouldn't be flaming nobody. Period. I said I didn't want to 
offend anybody.
 
<< synth is huge, in your opinion way to big to ever be used.  so 
there is a future for the box is this a bad thing?>>
Ok, I'll tell you my ideas about that.
Extensive ADSR and Filter/LFO features are great for simulating 
playing techniques in classic or acoustic type of sounds.
For electronic/classic synth type of sounds, I think a 
virtual-analog machine is much better. A PCM type of engine 
cannot give you that sound/smoothness/expression, no matter 
how good the waveforms or how extensive the mod matrix & 
filters. For me, it is the same as graphically comparing a random 
wave with a sine. From a distance, they might seem similar, but 
in detail, the sine is smooth, the other is rough.
For drum type of sounds, a mod matrix is overkill. None of those 
samples has the time to develop over time. 
For pop/rock/bread'n'butter type of sounds the main editing 
shortcuts (cutoff/rez, ADSR, LFO rate & wave) are usually plenty. 
Obviously I am not here to tell you you shouldn't filter a piano and 
morph it in any way you like, tremoloing with a distortion applied 
to the tail end of the filter release or whatever. 
I just meant that, for the typical average user of this kind of 
machines, this programming features are a trifle too much when 
compared to the skimpy features of the sequencer. I appreciate 
them in the P-2000, but in this machine the sequencer should 
be king. And a sampler, too.

One thing I did not mention yesterday, comparing this box with 
the competition, is that it lacks a realtime arrangement feature 
called transpose pattern; am I wrong?
And anyway, my biggest issue is that I still can't download the 
new OS into it.

Peace

Max

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.