I think some software will perform XXX operations better than other soft/hard. I have experienced over the years what I have subjectively considered to be "bad Normalization" and "good Normalization). >>>Not disagreeing here, I just don't have enough experience with other software to verify. I personally use Wavelab 4 for all of my audio editing, and always have. In "theory", normalization shouldn't involve any calculations that would affect audio quality (you're just tacking on extra bits), though certainly each manufacturer can have a different way of doing it. <<< I am currently working with a Creamware SFP system and the Digital Gain that is available in the SFP mixer is great (imo) - but I guess what you are saying is that a more sure-fire QC method is Normalization, not Digital gain...and I can see the logic there. >>>Pretty much hits it on the head. I think there are vast differences in how various software companies calculate things like gain change, so certainly some manufacturers are better than others in this regard. It's all about the processing resultion (is the signal path 24 bit, 32 float, 64bit, etc), and more importantly, how do they deal with any calculation remainders. Some companies used to just 'throw away' the extra bits post-calc, ouch! <<< Which raises the question: In the E4 we do not have to think about this exact subject in the same way given the variable HEADROOM setting in the MASTER section (allows digital signal to be raised or lowered) - do you know how this type of operation figures into all that we have been discussing here? >>>Without knowing how it's implemented, I can't say. I'm totally unfamiliar with the Emu sampler range too. Again, 'in theory' anytime you change the gain digitally, you're affecting the quality of the audio. But as I said in the last email, we're talking about VERY minor amounts of distortion. Much lower than the noise floor of tape for instance. <<< rEalm The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. For Translation: http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: SPDIF signal enhancers
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.