the quality of Normalization does depend on the software that is being used to Normalize, and of course we all know that in the N process the audio takes a hit, so to a degree one has to weigh which hit they prefer - N or A/D. >>>Hmmm, not sure I agree actually (though not sayig you're wrong either). Normalization is a fairly simple operation, you're just adding more bits to the existing signal, not altering it or performing any calculation that could introduce truncation errors. <<< I find myself continually more drawn to an analog re-recording of the XL7 - and have not found noise to be an issue. >>>Me neither, the analog outs are certain fine, and I too use those most of the time. <<< That said - depending on what DAW software is being used one should be able to boost the XL7 spdif signal before/during the recording. >>>This is where you'll start to incure errors though. Any time you raise the gain of a digital signal via software (ala, you raise the input fader in your DAW) you're performing calculations on the signal. Truncation errors can occur, so the signal will not be as clean as it you had just recorded it straight and then normalized after the fact. That being said, lets keep this all in perspective. Truncation errors occur at roughly round -144dBFS in a 24 bit signal, so it's hardly likely you'd be able to hear them. If nothing else, the dither added during bit reduction later in the process will be louder than those errors. The issue with truncation errors is that it's cumulative, so the more operations you do, the more likely you are to hear them. Again, these are VERY small in terms of how they degrade the signal quality though. <<< I hear time and again that the optimum place to aim for in a 24 bit recording of individual tracks is -6 db (Bob Katz, the Metric Halo guys et al), for whatever that is worth. >>>For recording individual tracks, yes I agree, you're only losing 1 bit of resolution in a 24 bit signal, so it's no big deal (for those that don't know each bit in a 24 bit signal is about 6dB of level). My comments were geared ONLY towards normalization, and I used the -2dB as an "upper" limit. To be honest, if I record the XL-7 digitally, I just leave it at around the -14dB it's typically was recorded at, and don't even bother to normalize. When I track individual instruments, I too aim for around the -6dB mark. Anyone interested in this geeky kind of stuff should definitely get the book "Mastering Audio" by Bob Katz, goes into much more detail on all of these topics, very highly recommended. <<< roll backward, rEalm The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. For Translation: http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: SPDIF signal enhancers
2004-02-11 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.