Hi, I second eriks wishlist and the faq hint mediaworksus posted here. Now: Compared to the RS7000 user group this user group is all about how to overcome or find workarounds for 1. bugs (**-7 and e-loader) 2. complicated GUI and a remarkably helpful emu tech support. Now I want to get this off my chest: 1. I paid good money and can expect a machine with less bugs. I use the mp-7 and the korg es1, had the yammie RM1x, Roland mc-307, tested thoroughly the Yammie RS7000. Perhaps they all (except the korg) suffer from more or less pattern glitches when arrangements are overloaded but emu command stations seem to lead the field when it comes to bugs. I only hope the emu techs will give us a decent os- version in the very near future (no disapperaing notes, wierdly changing presets etc.) I wonder about the quality department at EMU... 2. The user friendlyness and workflow of the commandstations leave a lot to be desired! These machines have so many features but with their small displays they force you to step through menus and menus to do simple things like replacing a pattern without merging etc. A good overview of all tracks and settings is not possible at all. Why Emu is still using a GUI of the 80s with such a powerful machine is beyond me. Even less powerful grooveboxes like the RM1x and the MC- 307 give you more in this aspect. A helpful mp-7 owner posted a message and proposed to use a computer for composing songs with the mp-7. But then again it would be enough to buy the mophatt and do the sequencing with the computer, hm? Why am I still keeping the mp-7? Because I love the wonderful sounds (was instantly sold to this), the grid recording, the solid hardware and the expansion feature. But the more I look for workarounds in this user group or fiddle around buttonpressing to set up my arrangements the more I doubt this box is for me. But there is still hope and I want to put this on the wishlist: bugs fixed: notes disappearing, presets wierdly changed, instable timing (happened only once) effect settings per channel user drum setup note by note (not via layers and links) workflow with easily exchangable phrases (if you want to try out different hihat patterns for example), arpeggios are a very timeconsuming work around for that. pattern-arpeggios programmable via grid mode I dont want to pick on the command stations. Other musicians may work with them without probs. But quite a few do not. I myself was not only once frustrated with this machine. Then again I was very happy with the results. But it is inexcusably hard to get there. Peace Heinrich
Message
Some nagging and a wishlist
2002-01-09 by heinrich22001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.