Wiard aesthetics
2002-11-21 by JR Ross
Konkuro wrote: >So get a cheap honky-tonk piano to bang on and >reserve the Boesendorpher, if that's how you spell >it, for the real deal Bosendorfer, with an umlaut over the first "o". K: >A tri-colored LED is a lightshow. Perhaps in certain cases, but the one on my MoogerFooger MF-104 Delay is quite useful, as changes in color quickly alert the user to changes in signal intensity, which can be quite important. I cannot comment on the functionality of Wiard LEDs as I do not own a Wiard (yet--one day when I have a job and can afford at least four modules--the minimum number of compromise choices, as deciding on any particular module over another is very, very hard with Wiard). K: >Yes, were that only true. Do you think that when > Beethoven sat down to write a symphony that the >destination was unknown? When an author >writes a book (at least a good one), do you think > he just pens a bunch of random thoughts in the hope >that they will solidify into a plot? I was going to mention "Ulysses", but that sort of makes your point:). Actually, I know that for my compositions (often third stream jazz/classical in form or idea) I often have only a rough idea or sketch of a beginning and the destination comes as part of the development. That is the joy of the creative process for me, as if I knew where I was going, I wouldn't see a need to do it as it would be fully formed already. Of course, I'm not Beethoven by any means (hell, I'm probably not in Beethoven's dog's league), but the amount of rewriting that he is believed to have done would indicate that his destination might not have been known in advance. K: >Good instruments are important to the creation of >art, but their form must follow function. Not slavishly, though. Piano makers have almost always reserved their finest work for art-case models, where functionality is not hindered, but form is often allowed to take fantastic journeys from the norm. The modern trend towards minimalism and conservatism in piano (or keyboard in general) aesthetics is just that, modern, and not a historical fact. Look at the wonderful paintings that often accompanied harpsichords and virginals. Even the violin, often the standard for functionalism in instruments, is in fact full of pointless and unnecessary flourishes: scrolls on the peg-head, the horns on the body, the f-hole shape, carvings and more. That these are not recognized as purely aesthetic criteria is because of the familiarity of the design, not any inherent functionality. Thus, if the Wiard form does not hinder function, then aesthetic choices made are just that. Wiard represents the whimsical and fantastic element of modular synthesizer design with a great many flourishes that have no value beyond the aesthetic. Almost all others represent a minimalist approach. If one prefers that, fine, but the history of musical instruments in society has tended towards ornamental excess, not minimalism. De gustibus non est disputandem. All art is subjective, and even a rose doesn't look the same to any two people. Myself, I hate flowers. ()() JR "Bulldogge" Ross () () & Snuffy, too:) `---' __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com