Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Thread

for our pleasure

for our pleasure

2007-04-06 by kursk53704

There are two people that I worship: Noam Chomsky and Brian Eno. I serve many: my 
family and friends and my many students (I teach history in a Madison, Wisconsin HS). I'm 
an avid reader, I worry for my kids, I love my wife, etc, etc. But I do have to say that, aside 
from my loves and responsibilities, modular experimentation is . . . it fills an artistic/
spiritual desire that couldn't be filled my another means I suppose. In this regard Grant is 
almost, for me, in the same category as Chomsky and Eno. There are some differences: 
they are rich, Grant lives on the edge of poverty; I can generally understand Chomsky and 
Eno's ideas, while I often have no fucking idea what Grant is talking about (too technical); 
I've never met either Chomsky or Eno, while sometimes I drive down to Milwaukee to pick 
up a module and have a chat with Grant. I always look forward to the occasion.
 
Last time I was there a few months ago to pick up the Borg 2, Grant described this new 
instrument he wanted to design. A synth in a suitcase, like a Synthi. He didn't go into too 
much detail (in which case I would have been lost in the details) but it basically would be 
something like the following: his new oscillator, a beefed-up noise ring, envelooper, 
boogie and a borg 2 (for filtering and lo pass gate applications), JAG and joystick, and 
some other utilitarian circuits. It would have a touch capacitor keyboard and a 
microprocessor for added sequencing/modulaion. All in a samsonite like briefcase and all 
behind a single faceplate (which would serve to lower the overall cost). I don't remember if 
it would have a pin matrix for patching. I'm not sure if I asked about this. In any case this 
sounds awesome, especially for live and/or other portable possibilities. I hope Grant goes 
through with this. The 300 series is a bit out of reach for many of us (both technically and 
financially). Maybe this other design could fill a desire that could both satisfy those who 
can't , or won't, acquire a 300, and provide a sort of commercially successful product for 
Grant.

 I liked Doc's comment on how Grant's business model is perhaps a protest against the 
mainstream's distorted and consumption oriented freefall where demands and "needs" are 
created in an endless orgy of materialism (maybe I'm exaggerating Doc's point). As always, 
I wish Grant good health, success, and good luck as I patiently wait to see where he takes 
Wiard next.

Bill

Re: [wiardgroup] for our pleasure

2007-04-06 by amnesia

This sounds amazing :-) I wish I hadn't heard that I am struggling to 
get the money together for 6 modules :-)...but if this ever comes out I 
will have to get a second job or sell one of my kids :-)

One thing that I am not sure about is when Grant mentioned that the 
Buchla 200e he didn't want to compete against, is he saying the Wiard is 
close to a Buchla ? Again I dont own a Buchla or Wiard never seen them 
in the flesh, so was just curious about the comment.

Ross



kursk53704 wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> There are two people that I worship: Noam Chomsky and Brian Eno. I 
> serve many: my
> family and friends and my many students (I teach history in a Madison, 
> Wisconsin HS). I'm
> an avid reader, I worry for my kids, I love my wife, etc, etc. But I 
> do have to say that, aside
> from my loves and responsibilities, modular experimentation is . . . 
> it fills an artistic/
> spiritual desire that couldn't be filled my another means I suppose. 
> In this regard Grant is
> almost, for me, in the same category as Chomsky and Eno. There are 
> some differences:
> they are rich, Grant lives on the edge of poverty; I can generally 
> understand Chomsky and
> Eno's ideas, while I often have no fucking idea what Grant is talking 
> about (too technical);
> I've never met either Chomsky or Eno, while sometimes I drive down to 
> Milwaukee to pick
> up a module and have a chat with Grant. I always look forward to the 
> occasion.
>
> Last time I was there a few months ago to pick up the Borg 2, Grant 
> described this new
> instrument he wanted to design. A synth in a suitcase, like a Synthi. 
> He didn't go into too
> much detail (in which case I would have been lost in the details) but 
> it basically would be
> something like the following: his new oscillator, a beefed-up noise 
> ring, envelooper,
> boogie and a borg 2 (for filtering and lo pass gate applications), JAG 
> and joystick, and
> some other utilitarian circuits. It would have a touch capacitor 
> keyboard and a
> microprocessor for added sequencing/modulaion. All in a samsonite like 
> briefcase and all
> behind a single faceplate (which would serve to lower the overall 
> cost). I don't remember if
> it would have a pin matrix for patching. I'm not sure if I asked about 
> this. In any case this
> sounds awesome, especially for live and/or other portable 
> possibilities. I hope Grant goes
> through with this. The 300 series is a bit out of reach for many of us 
> (both technically and
> financially). Maybe this other design could fill a desire that could 
> both satisfy those who
> can't , or won't, acquire a 300, and provide a sort of commercially 
> successful product for
> Grant.
>
> I liked Doc's comment on how Grant's business model is perhaps a 
> protest against the
> mainstream's distorted and consumption oriented freefall where demands 
> and "needs" are
> created in an endless orgy of materialism (maybe I'm exaggerating 
> Doc's point). As always,
> I wish Grant good health, success, and good luck as I patiently wait 
> to see where he takes
> Wiard next.
>
> Bill
>
>

Re: for our pleasure

2007-04-06 by stefanbonnet

The price of the 300's does make them less accessible to most of us..(as a reference, one 
module costs more than what I have to monthly pay not to be homeless, which is already 
half my income...), but from my experience with the 1200's, and given the added 
fonctions, I don't think it isn't honest, nor not worth the wait.

Grant, I feel a bit sorry that I didn't react to your "a bit like the synthi ?" answer to my 
blurry integrated design ideas, on the phone (my tongue needs more than a few minutes 
to warm up in english...Thanks for your patience...).

kind regards everybody

Re: [wiardgroup] new suitcase Wiard

2007-04-06 by Les Mizzell

> I spoke to Grant the other day and we spoke about our Synthi's..he never
> mentioned this new box. =-O


What? Pics? Specs?

Re: [wiardgroup] for our pleasure

2007-04-06 by Eyesaw

A WIARD synth in a suitcase. Yes, Yes, Yes - Perfect!
Bill
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: kursk53704
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:38 PM
Subject: [wiardgroup] for our pleasure

There are two people that I worship: Noam Chomsky and Brian Eno. I serve many: my
family and friends and my many students (I teach history in a Madison, Wisconsin HS). I'm
an avid reader, I worry for my kids, I love my wife, etc, etc. But I do have to say that, aside
from my loves and responsibilities, modular experimentation is . . . it fills an artistic/
spiritual desire that couldn't be filled my another means I suppose. In this regard Grant is
almost, for me, in the same category as Chomsky and Eno. There are some differences:
they are rich, Grant lives on the edge of poverty; I can generally understand Chomsky and
Eno's ideas, while I often have no fucking idea what Grant is talking about (too technical);
I've never met either Chomsky or Eno, while sometimes I drive down to Milwaukee to pick
up a module and have a chat with Grant. I always look forward to the occasion.

Last time I was there a few months ago to pick up the Borg 2, Grant described this new
instrument he wanted to design. A synth in a suitcase, like a Synthi. He didn't go into too
much detail (in which case I would have been lost in the details) but it basically would be
something like the following: his new oscillator, a beefed-up noise ring, envelooper,
boogie and a borg 2 (for filtering and lo pass gate applications), JAG and joystick, and
some other utilitarian circuits. It would have a touch capacitor keyboard and a
microprocessor for added sequencing/modulaion. All in a samsonite like briefcase and all
behind a single faceplate (which would serve to lower the overall cost). I don't remember if
it would have a pin matrix for patching. I'm not sure if I asked about this. In any case this
sounds awesome, especially for live and/or other portable possibilities. I hope Grant goes
through with this. The 300 series is a bit out of reach for many of us (both technically and
financially). Maybe this other design could fill a desire that could both satisfy those who
can't , or won't, acquire a 300, and provide a sort of commercially successful product for
Grant.

I liked Doc's comment on how Grant's business model is perhaps a protest against the
mainstream's distorted and consumption oriented freefall where demands and "needs" are
created in an endless orgy of materialism (maybe I'm exaggerating Doc's point). As always,
I wish Grant good health, success, and good luck as I patiently wait to see where he takes
Wiard next.

Bill



avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 04/05/2007
Tested on: 4/6/2007 7:20:53 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.




avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 04/05/2007
Tested on: 4/6/2007 9:09:44 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.


Re: for our pleasure

2007-04-06 by Gary Chang

So, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak, but there is something to
consider...  Remember - Grant is trying to raise money to fund the
further developement of this project, so he needs to sell 300 Series
modules!

Waiting for the suitcase electronium to become a reality will insure
that it will never happen!!!  


gc



"Eyesaw" <eyesaw@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A WIARD synth in a suitcase. Yes, Yes, Yes - Perfect!
> 
> Bill
> 
>

new suitcase Wiard

2007-04-06 by amnesia

I spoke to Grant the other day and we spoke about our Synthi's..he never 
mentioned this new box. =-O

is this still in the ether or due for release by the end of the year?

>
>

Re: new suitcase Wiard

2007-04-07 by Grant Richter

> is this still in the ether or due for release by the end of the year?

I am attempting to do something on the difficulty level of the Yamaha DX7.
Whereas Yamaha has hundreds of people to work on such projects,
I am only one person.

Also I have to invent all of this technology from the ground up. There
are no existing designs to copy, and no reseach papers to "crib" from.

Re: for our pleasure

2007-04-07 by kursk53704

Sorry Grant for my impulsive proclamation about the suitcase synth. 
My excitement overcame discretion. Guess that's the last time you'll 
share any secrets with me. Having a baby daughter has somehow ruined 
my sense of caution or social etiquette. It's all her fault.

Forgive me,
Bill

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" <gchang@...> wrote:
>
> So, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak, but there is something 
to
> consider...  Remember - Grant is trying to raise money to fund the
> further developement of this project, so he needs to sell 300 
Series
> modules!
> 
> Waiting for the suitcase electronium to become a reality will 
insure
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> that it will never happen!!!  
> 
> 
> gc
> 
> 
> 
> "Eyesaw" <eyesaw@> wrote:
> >
> > A WIARD synth in a suitcase. Yes, Yes, Yes - Perfect!
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> >
>

Re: for our pleasure

2007-04-07 by Grant Richter

Hello Bill,

There is no problem, I have been telling people since 1999
that I would like to make it fully interated synth. So it is
no secret. I think the wording created the impression
that it is "right around the corner".

Same with the Envelooper, with advanced modules like this
(a brand new design) and with the user group part of
the research "team", it is not possible to keep it a secret
until launch.

I wish it was as easy as snapping my fingers, but that dang reality...


--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "kursk53704" <kursk1@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Sorry Grant for my impulsive proclamation about the suitcase synth. 
> My excitement overcame discretion. Guess that's the last time you'll 
> share any secrets with me. Having a baby daughter has somehow ruined 
> my sense of caution or social etiquette. It's all her fault.
> 
> Forgive me,
> Bill
> 
> --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" <gchang@> wrote:
> >
> > So, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak, but there is something 
> to
> > consider...  Remember - Grant is trying to raise money to fund the
> > further developement of this project, so he needs to sell 300 
> Series
> > modules!
> > 
> > Waiting for the suitcase electronium to become a reality will 
> insure
> > that it will never happen!!!  
> > 
> > 
> > gc
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "Eyesaw" <eyesaw@> wrote:
> > >
> > > A WIARD synth in a suitcase. Yes, Yes, Yes - Perfect!
> > > 
> > > Bill
> > > 
> > >
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.