Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Thread

Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

2006-09-09 by Grant Richter

I will try to explain a little of the philosophy behind the Wiard modules. It has to do with 
the "East vs. West" coast synthesizer history. This is an over simplified explaination, some 
"East Coast" instruments support FM for example.

It really starts with the concept of a patch. In the "East Coast" instruments (basically all 
synthesizer manufacturers except Wiard, Buchla and Serge) you have a subtractive 
synthesis patch entirely oriented towards the filter. This is your classic VCO-VCF-VCA 
connection with ADSR type envelopes. The envelopes generators typically have only a 
single output. The oscillators usually have very simple waveforms such as sawtooth and 
square wave. This is what most people are introduced to and why many people are 
puzzled by more complex instruments like the Wiard. This patch makes sense for playing 
with a black and white type keyboard. It produce a limited but pleasing range of timbres 
and is easy to operate and understand.

In the "West Coast" instruments, there are 3 possible synthesis modes. Additive, non-
linear waveshaping and dynamic depth FM are the primary synthesis modes. "East Coast" 
subtractive synthesis is typically not DIRECTLY supported. It was not in the Buchla or Serge 
(no 24 dB/Oct. resonant filter). Good aproximations of subtractive synthesis can be patch 
on the Serge with cascaded filters. These instruments are oriented towards controlling 
with a multiple output sequencer or multiple output complex envelope generator intead of 
a black and white keyboard. They produce a larger and more importantly, different set of 
timbres than the simpler "East Coast" instruments.

The classic patch in a "West Coast" instrument involves two blocks. The first is a complex 
oscillator which supports both non-linear waveshaping and dynamic depth FM (Buchla 259 
and Serge NTO). The second signal processor is a Lowpass Gate or "frequency and 
amplitude domain processor". The primary timbre generation is done directly with the 
oscillator, and the Lowpass Gate just tweaks the amplitude and frequency character. These 
two blocks are designed to be controlled by one complex envelope generator with multiple 
outputs routed to all the timbre factors.

Once again this is a simplifed explaination to illustrate subtle points. Actual usage involves 
a combination of both techniques.

In the 1200 series we have the groundwork laid for a complex "West Coast" voice. The JAG 
will convert two simple ADSR envelopes into a multiple output complex envelope 
generator. The Boogie Filter can be used as a Lowpass Gate but also supports the "East 
Coast" Moog type subtractive character. The Borg 2 Filter is a classic Lowpass Gate that 
can also be used like the "East Coast" MS20 subtractive filter.

The icing on the cake is the complex oscillator. The Wiard Synthesizer Mini-Wave and VCO
(manufactured under license by Blacet Research) is a type of complex oscillator and non-
linear waveshaper already well established. A lot of good work has been done with these 
Wiard designs. Improving on such a solid base is no easy task.

It would be great if a complex oscillator could support as many timbre modes as possible. 
Simultaneous support for multiple non-linear waveshaping, dynamic depth PM and 
wavetable would be ideal. If each of these was independent, you could look at them like 
geometric axis. Modulating the timbre parameters then becomes a matter of "walking 
about" in a large timbre space with multiple dimensions of simultaneous control. This is 
true timbre morphing and not just simple crossfading between timbres (which is good 
too).

This is where my research is currently focused. Exactly when the complex oscillator will be 
finished depends upon sales of the existing 1200 series modules. If the public is not 
interested in the extra "West Coast" synthesis methodology, it would be foolish to waste 
time and money on products for that purpose.

"East Coast" designs are as common as dandelions, but I feel support for subtractive 
synthesis should be included in a complete instrument. That is why the Wiard designs 
support BOTH East and West Coast synthesis methods. For example, any Wiard complex 
VCO will include classic subtractive waveform outputs in addition to the complex outputs.

I think that I need to focus on education to promote the idea of the more complex 
synthesis "West Coast" style. I am going to try and write manuals for the Boogie and Borg 2 
modules that cover the less obvious operating modes. For the short term, I will be 
concentrating on that.

As always, thank you to all you fine people for your continued support and all the amazing 
music you have sent me. Keep up the good work and thank you again.

Re: [wiardgroup] Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

2006-09-10 by John Mahoney

At 06:56 PM 9/9/2006, Grant Richter wrote:
>I will try to explain a little of the philosophy behind the Wiard 
>modules. It has to do with
>the "East vs. West" coast synthesizer history. This is an over 
>simplified explaination, some
>"East Coast" instruments support FM for example.

Excellent post, Grant. Thanks.


>In the "West Coast" instruments, there are 3 possible synthesis 
>modes. Additive, non-
>linear waveshaping and dynamic depth FM are the primary synthesis modes....

Like most people's, my knowledge is quite slanted toward the East 
coast school. So, for example, I don't understand why non-linear 
waveshaping and dynamic depth FM can't be done with East coast style 
VCOs. (I'm not asking you to expound on this, though I would 
certainly welcome anything more that you'd care to write.)

Off the top of my head, it seems that dynamic depth FM would require 
2 "East coast" VCOs -- one with a linear FM input -- and a VCA to 
modulate the FM depth. Am I oversimplifying? Wouldn't be the first time. ;-)

There's also been a lot said about the need for through-zero 
operation, but we don't need to get into a big ZO discussion, do we?


>.. The JAG will convert two simple ADSR envelopes
>into a multiple output complex envelope generator....

Now there's an interesting idea!


>... Modulating the timbre parameters then becomes a matter of "walking
>about" in a large timbre space with multiple dimensions of 
>simultaneous control. This is
>true timbre morphing and not just simple crossfading between timbres 
>(which is good
>too).

Cool. Sounds like the "terrain" thing you've mentioned.


>... I feel support for subtractive
>synthesis should be included in a complete instrument. That is why 
>the Wiard designs
>support BOTH East and West Coast synthesis methods....

Great philosophy.


>I think that I need to focus on education to promote the idea of the 
>more complex
>synthesis "West Coast" style....

Yes, one problem with deviating from the beaten path is that too many 
people don't understand where you are going. Like I said, I am among 
those who need to learn more about the West coast ways.


>As always, thank you to all you fine people for your continued 
>support and all the amazing
>music you have sent me. Keep up the good work and thank you again.

Thank you for trying to educate us and for continuing to expand the 
boundaries of synthesis.
--
john

Re: Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

2006-09-10 by Grant Richter

> 
> Excellent post, Grant. Thanks.
> 
> 
> >In the "West Coast" instruments, there are 3 possible synthesis 
> >modes. Additive, non-
> >linear waveshaping and dynamic depth FM are the primary synthesis modes....
> 
> Like most people's, my knowledge is quite slanted toward the East 
> coast school. So, for example, I don't understand why non-linear 
> waveshaping and dynamic depth FM can't be done with East coast style 
> VCOs. (I'm not asking you to expound on this, though I would 
> certainly welcome anything more that you'd care to write.)

The only thing preventing it is that the features are not available! A Minimoog, Arp 
Oddyssey or 2600 do not support non-linear waveshaping. IIRC the FM is also exponential 
and not linear.

> 
> Off the top of my head, it seems that dynamic depth FM would require 
> 2 "East coast" VCOs -- one with a linear FM input -- and a VCA to 
> modulate the FM depth. Am I oversimplifying? Wouldn't be the first time. ;-)

In the case of the 259, it contain two oscillators and a VCA for modulation depth.

> There's also been a lot said about the need for through-zero 
> operation, but we don't need to get into a big ZO discussion, do we?

I have designed and tested a through zero core. My only concern is that the extra 
componentry will adversely affect stability. It is hard enough to get a stable analog VCO 
with out doubling the component count of the core.

> >... Modulating the timbre parameters then becomes a matter of "walking
> >about" in a large timbre space with multiple dimensions of 
> >simultaneous control. This is
> >true timbre morphing and not just simple crossfading between timbres 
> >(which is good
> >too).
> 
> Cool. Sounds like the "terrain" thing you've mentioned.

The original Wave Terrain designs were an algorithm used to compute a waveform in real 
time to eliminate the memory needed for waveform storage. The idea of "wave terrain" was 
the start of looking at wavefrom generation from a geometric, rather than algebraic 
perspective. In reality, a drum for example is a four dimensional generator, it is "projected" 
down to two dimensions by a microphone. The idea of starting with a multi-dimensional 
wave generating process is what is important.

Re: Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

2006-09-10 by Grant Richter

> > There's also been a lot said about the need for through-zero 
> > operation, but we don't need to get into a big ZO discussion, do we?
> 
> I have designed and tested a through zero core. My only concern is that the extra 
> componentry will adversely affect stability. It is hard enough to get a stable analog VCO 
> with out doubling the component count of the core.
> 

The other issue with through zero FM is the oscillator core. The mathematics requires a 
unidirectional phase vector, that is a sawtooth. The only through zero core designs I have 
seen are for triangle cores. If you can point me to a through zero sawtooth core design, I 
would be interested in seeing it.

Re: Future products and a synthesizer tutorial

2006-12-18 by ethanzer0

Hi Grant,

Your treatise on "West Coast" synthesis technique is fascinating!  I 
am wondering if you be so kind as to elaborate on some more 
advanced "West Coast" techniques? I believe the community at large is 
strongly lacking in this knowledge and would benefit significantly 
from it.

Also, can you provide a few examples of achieving these techniques 
with Wiard 300 or Wiard 1200/Blacet modules?  If I could actually 
play with these ideas I could get a better understanding.

Thank you!

Ethan

> The icing on the cake is the complex oscillator. The Wiard 
Synthesizer Mini-Wave and VCO
> (manufactured under license by Blacet Research) is a type of 
complex oscillator and non-
> linear waveshaper already well established. A lot of good work has 
been done with these 
> Wiard designs. Improving on such a solid base is no easy task.
>

More synthesizer tutorial

2006-12-18 by Grant Richter

Some more comments on "West Coast" techniques.

The main difference between the two techniques are how the filter is applied. In "East 
Coast" technique, you start with simple waveforms and used the filter to do your timbre 
control. The classic East Coast patch is VCO - VCF - VCA with ADSR envelopes for the VCF 
and VCA.

In one of the "West Coast" techniques, you start with complex waveforms and use the filter 
just to do final tone shaping. Of course crank up the resonance if you want to mix the two 
techniques.

How do you get complex waveforms? The Wiard-Blacet Mini-wave or 300 series Waveform 
City is a good source of complex waveforms when used as a wavetable playback device. 
These complex waveforms can be made even more complex by the use of synch and FM at 
the same time. The Mini-wave/Wavefrom city can also be used as a wave multiplier for 
non-linear synthesis.

Here are a couple of simple patches that are "West" sounding.

VCO(sine) - VCA -  LINFMVCO(sine) - Borg in lowpass gate mode (VCA).

You use the first VCA to dynamically control the depth of linear FM. Envelopes are routed 
to the FM depth VCA and to the Borg tone shaper. The use of sine waves produces "nice" 
sounding FM along with the soft Borg envelope. With the first VCO set to about 7 Hz and 
the linear FM control of the second VCO  barely open, you have dynamic and natural 
sounding vibrato.

VCO(sine) - LINFMVCO(sine) - VCA - Mini-wave(+/- 5v) - Borg in lowpass gate mode 
(VCA)

This is a fixed depth FM patch going to a dynamic depth wave multiplier. Envelopes are 
routed to the first VCA and to the Borg. The VCA before the Mini-Wave needs to have 
controls to set initial volume and control the amount of envelope (like an ARP 2600 VCA 
has). You want to adjust the VCA so it is about 20% on with no envelope. Then adjust the 
amount of envelope sweep to your taste. You can play with any bank or wave in the Mini-
wave but Bank 13 is designed just for this use.

Banks 0 to 7 of the "Socket Rocket" chip are designed to process audio input. In this case 
the VCA is set 100% on. Bank 6 "Bit Descimation" can really make a drum track gnarly 
when set to 4 bits or less.

One thing to look at is the "Socket Rocket" users manual. This is a 10 meg pdf file.

Go to

http://www.musicsynthesizer.com/DIY/Grant/grant_richters_synthdiy.htm

and scroll to the bottom under "Discontinued Products" Right click on "Socket Rocket Final 
Manual" and save the pdf file to the desktop or your prefered location. This has ideas for 
using the waves in the Socket Rocket chip. I used an ARP 2600 and 1630 sequencer to 
reference the patches.

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "ethanzer0" <ethanzer0@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Grant,
> 
> Your treatise on "West Coast" synthesis technique is fascinating!  I 
> am wondering if you be so kind as to elaborate on some more 
> advanced "West Coast" techniques? I believe the community at large is 
> strongly lacking in this knowledge and would benefit significantly 
> from it.
> 
> Also, can you provide a few examples of achieving these techniques 
> with Wiard 300 or Wiard 1200/Blacet modules?  If I could actually 
> play with these ideas I could get a better understanding.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Ethan
> 
> > The icing on the cake is the complex oscillator. The Wiard 
> Synthesizer Mini-Wave and VCO
> > (manufactured under license by Blacet Research) is a type of 
> complex oscillator and non-
> > linear waveshaper already well established. A lot of good work has 
> been done with these 
> > Wiard designs. Improving on such a solid base is no easy task.
> >
>

Re: [wiardgroup] More synthesizer tutorial

2006-12-19 by watson

thank you so much grant for posting this info, i remember talking in depth with you about the east coast west coast "thang" on th phone but this really opens up more ideas for me, the way i look at it even if somthig has to be explained to me like you would explain to a five year old....if it makes me better i dont care to sound or look dumb. so the list can catch me with my pants down if you want!! hehehe
thanks

On 12/18/06, Grant Richter <grichter@asapnet.net> wrote:

Some more comments on "West Coast" techniques.

The main difference between the two techniques are how the filter is applied. In "East
Coast" technique, you start with simple waveforms and used the filter to do your timbre
control. The classic East Coast patch is VCO - VCF - VCA with ADSR envelopes for the VCF
and VCA.

In one of the "West Coast" techniques, you start with complex waveforms and use the filter
just to do final tone shaping. Of course crank up the resonance if you want to mix the two
techniques.

How do you get complex waveforms? The Wiard-Blacet Mini-wave or 300 series Waveform
City is a good source of complex waveforms when used as a wavetable playback device.
These complex waveforms can be made even more complex by the use of synch and FM at
the same time. The Mini-wave/Wavefrom city can also be used as a wave multiplier for
non-linear synthesis.

Here are a couple of simple patches that are "West" sounding.

VCO(sine) - VCA - LINFMVCO(sine) - Borg in lowpass gate mode (VCA).

You use the first VCA to dynamically control the depth of linear FM. Envelopes are routed
to the FM depth VCA and to the Borg tone shaper. The use of sine waves produces "nice"
sounding FM along with the soft Borg envelope. With the first VCO set to about 7 Hz and
the linear FM control of the second VCO barely open, you have dynamic and natural
sounding vibrato.

VCO(sine) - LINFMVCO(sine) - VCA - Mini-wave(+/- 5v) - Borg in lowpass gate mode
(VCA)

This is a fixed depth FM patch going to a dynamic depth wave multiplier. Envelopes are
routed to the first VCA and to the Borg. The VCA before the Mini-Wave needs to have
controls to set initial volume and control the amount of envelope (like an ARP 2600 VCA
has). You want to adjust the VCA so it is about 20% on with no envelope. Then adjust the
amount of envelope sweep to your taste. You can play with any bank or wave in the Mini-
wave but Bank 13 is designed just for this use.

Banks 0 to 7 of the "Socket Rocket" chip are designed to process audio input. In this case
the VCA is set 100% on. Bank 6 "Bit Descimation" can really make a drum track gnarly
when set to 4 bits or less.

One thing to look at is the "Socket Rocket" users manual. This is a 10 meg pdf file.

Go to

http://www.musicsynthesizer.com/DIY/Grant/grant_richters_synthdiy.htm

and scroll to the bottom under "Discontinued Products" Right click on "Socket Rocket Final
Manual" and save the pdf file to the desktop or your prefered location. This has ideas for
using the waves in the Socket Rocket chip. I used an ARP 2600 and 1630 sequencer to
reference the patches.

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "ethanzer0" wrote:
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> Your treatise on "West Coast" synthesis technique is fascinating! I
> am wondering if you be so kind as to elaborate on some more
> advanced "West Coast" techniques? I believe the community at large is
> strongly lacking in this knowledge and would benefit significantly
> from it.
>
> Also, can you provide a few examples of achieving these techniques
> with Wiard 300 or Wiard 1200/Blacet modules? If I could actually
> play with these ideas I could get a better understanding.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ethan
>
> > The icing on the cake is the complex oscillator. The Wiard
> Synthesizer Mini-Wave and VCO
> > (manufactured under license by Blacet Research) is a type of
> complex oscillator and non-
> > linear waveshaper already well established. A lot of good work has
> been done with these
> > Wiard designs. Improving on such a solid base is no easy task.
> >
>




--
i warned you not to go out tonight...

Re: More synthesizer tutorial

2006-12-23 by stefanbonnet

My experience is quite limited but I've found that keeping some parameters fixed (or very 
subtly modulated) helps a lot in generating more natural sounds (it can be a filter, or a 
carrier vco synched and linearly fmed by another one tracking the keyboard but tuned 
lower) as well as adding some noise/randomness here and there...

(My only gripe with my current setup is that getting high register voices that don't sound 
either flat, harsh or dull is critical...I don't know whether it's me, the vcos or my sound 
card...(?))

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.