Hi Dave,
"different" is correct. (see? there u go thinking again!)
the published #3 standard wogglebug is not, strictly, component-for-component, the same circuit as the 300-series dual-wogglebug. I didn't mean to imply that. (beastly sorry old chap!)
But the #3standard Wbug does contain the core circuit, (the 'heart' if you will) of all the successive revisions. The differences are in the sophistication of the peripheral parts of the circuit. If you build the #3standard Wbug you can leave it as 'bare bones' or as elaborately augmented as you like. I added many peripheral features that Grant didn't elect to include in the 300-series package in the ones I've built. That's the power & beauty of DIY.
The wogglebug is bigger than both of us, Dave, it will never die!
;'>
now onward! thru the fog!
-doc
--- In wiardgroup@y..., davevosh@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/4/2002 2:20:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> drmabuce@y... writes:
>
>
> > Keep in mind that wogglebug schematics are published at
> > www.musicsynthesizer.com so a DIY wogglebug is possible.
> >
>
>
> doc,
> i thought ( there i go thinking again......i should have learned by now ! )
> that the #3 standard wogglebug was different than the (wonderful ! )
> "delivered" 300 series module - ?
> best,
> daveMessage
Re: Too Heavy to be a Drag
2002-12-05 by drmabuce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.