Hi Paul, Glad you could drop by. Pauls modules are oriented towards doing a specific function perfectly and they are mechanically very rugged. The Wiard modules are oriented towards providing the maximum amount of NEW functionality in the smallest and lightest package. Both have their place in the orchestra of life. I have never considered Paul or anyone else a competitor. As a matter of fact, I have asked everyone who has inquired about a Wiard to look at the Synthesis Technology site to be sure they are aware of that option. It is more important to me that the customer be happy in the long run, than to just get their dollars. And I have never spoken negatively of ANY other modular manufacturer or their products. If one looks at a marketplace as having a limited number of participants, with all providers competeing for a fixed number of dollars, this is called a "zero sum game". That is where concepts such as "market share" come from. Rex Probe, John Blacet and I see the analog modular manufacturers competeing as a group against Korg, Roland and other "design by comittee" organizations. As such, the more successful any manufacturer is, the more successful the entire group is. We are working cooperatively to expand the marketplace by making it a friendly place to be. If you have a group of manufacturers stabbing each other in the back over here, but over here you have a group of friendly, mature people working together to further the Arts as whole, who would you rather purchase from? This is why I am actively working to make the Wiard designs available in as many mechanical formats as I can. The Wiard was never intended to be closed system, the designs are intended to expand the capabilites of ANY electronic music studio. The mechanical format was neccesary to have a carrier for the electronics. But I do not believe it is the solution to every need. John Blacet, Terry Michaels and I are working together to bring out a budget priced capable VCO module. This will allow younger people on a budget to start to learn about analog oscillators. If they remain interested, in the future they may purchase a Wiard, MOTM or other system. But if we do not expand the number of people involved, we will all become historical footnotes. Best Regards, Grant Richter > > MOTM is in a different market than Wiard. The format > is larger, less functions per module. In a way, we > compete for $$$ but there are several MOTM/Wiard dual > owners on this list. > > Blacet (www.blacet.com) sells a version of the > Waveform Cirty that Grant designed. Dave Bradley sells > MOTM-compatible faceplates for it. >
Message
Re: What is a MOTM
2001-08-29 by grantrichter2001@yahoo.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.