> Not trying to start a flame war here, but I found John > M.'s remarks from a very recent Analogue Heaven post > regarding the Wiard intriguing - so I thought I would > send them to the Wiard list to see if Grant (or anyone > with a 300 series)could shed some light on these 2 > items listed in the post below: > > Jack placement (centering) > > Functionality of the LEDs on the top of the panel The human race has traditionally recognized two distinct classes of objects: Functional objects and aesthetic objects. The difference is that functional objects can become obsolete and be replaced by more modern designs. They decrease in value with the passage of time. Aesthetic objects never become obsolete and they always increase in value with time. No one claims the Mona Lisa is obsolete (but someone surely will, just to prove me wrong ;^) and it is worth a LOT more today, than when it was first painted. The acoustic violin was not "replaced" by the music synthesizer because musical instruments are aesthetic objects and do not become obsolete. Musical instruments are traditionally ornamented to make them more pleasing to be around, and to plainly mark them as aesthetic objects deserving of thoughtful consideration and careful treatment. The reason that analog modulars almost became extinct is because their inventors viewed them as functional objects, and so they were presented as such. Because the inventors presented them as functional objects, their customers saw them as replaceable, and this is why the University of Chicago put their Buchla in the dumpster when they got their TX-816 digital synth. But a University would never think of throwing away a violin because they bought a cello. The Wiard has the added expense of ornamentation to clearly mark it as being in the tradition of musical instruments as an aesthetic object, and not a replaceable device. The Wiard is the first electronic modular deliberately designed to correct the oversight of presenting a music synthesizer as only a functional object. The Wiard is presented as an aesthetic object which will not become obsolete, and will always increase in value. Even today, second hand Wiard instruments sell for more than the new price. People make nonsensical remarks about the graphics, because they are confusing the Wiard with other objects called "modular synthesizers". These were envisioned by their designers as functional objects, and are not in the same class as the Wiard. Some people just don't get it.
Message
Fwd: [AH] Re: Synth Graphics, speaking of which
2002-11-19 by grantrichter2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.