I thought I would provide a somewhat different perspective from an existing 300-series owner. I did not cast the winning bid for this, but despite already owning each of the modules that make up this system I bid an amount greater than their combined "list price" of $3200. Perhaps a few of the factors I considered will shed light on the possible motivations of those who who bid more than I did for the system. One of the recurring topics Grant and I have discussed is the Wiard as an instrument in the classical sense (as opposed to a collection of electronic circuits) for which one can aspire to virtuosity as with more traditional mediums such as the violin or piano. I'm sure others of you have had similar conversations. This system's well- chosen selection of modules and ease of transport meet the practical demands of such a tool. The packaging itself further contributes to the feel of a classical instrument. (Having seen some of the custom cases built for Wiard systems by Grant, Gabe, and others I believe Sascha may underestimate the "worth" of this craftsmanship.) It is quite possible that the high bidder intends to use the Wiard as a performance instrument. I also found this system's heritage very appealing. Similar to many other examples of precious art, it was "commissioned" for a specific purpose, and a noble one at that: education. For a number of years students were introduced to "sound sculpting" on this system, much like some of you may have had early experiences with a university Moog, Buchla, Emu, or Serge that forever altered you. That's a very different past than the typical Doepfer off of an Eastern European assembly line. For me this sense of rich history would encourage me to treasure the system more deeply, much as the symphonic player fortunate enough to own a Stradivari does his or her instrument. Finally, as Sascha points out, the system's immediate availability does warrant some premium. It's easy for all of us to assume that Wiard modules will remain at $800 for the foreseeable future, and that the eventual supply will be adequate to meet our demand. But some of you who have not talked with Grant at length may not fully appreciate the labor that he pours into his creations. It's not a given that he will make these for another ten, five, or even one year. Certainly we all hope that Grant remains happy and in good health for years to come, but don't equate the process of investing in a hand-crafted Wiard system with the modern age's "click here to purchase" approach to commodity goods. And this ignores the utility value of the instrument for composition and/or performance between now and whenever a system ordered today arrives. For someone who earns at least a partial living from their music and feels a Wiard could contribute in a meaningful way, this value could easily be thousands of dollars. There's something to be said for committing, and the buyer of this system did just that. Many of us (myself included) spend or spent months or years thinking about the Wiard, comforted with an "option to buy" it along with many other potential tools. But at some point one has to get off the fence and decide if he is actually going to pursue a thing or just dream about it forever. For someone ready to take the Wiard plunge this system was a great way to dive in. So "way above value" is contingent upon the eye of the beholder. Chris --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "sascha victoria" <sascha.victoria@...> wrote: > > i considered bidding but decided it would go way above value. that being said i think there's a premium for not having to wait. the only "one of a kind" aspect of that system was the case and well, that case wasn't worth that much extra. i think i'll call grant and make my first wiard order tomorrow.
Message
Re: Legitimate Auction
2008-09-15 by paradigmshiftbeats
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.