Isn't this kind of an insult to to vision of the designer? A musical instrument is a work of art as well as a tool. When you use it often, you develop an intimate relationship with it. This includes the look and feel. When designing an instrument you take into consideration everything from the way the knobs feel in your hand and how far apart they are to what signal levels will be. They also consider the visual design of the machine. These things will make all the difference in how the machine is perceived in the marketplace. I know Grant put heart and soul into the creation of his dream synthesizer. In my opinion, asking him to make it look more like a competing product is a bit like saying. "I like the Porsche engine, but can you guys get rid of that ugly body and make it look like a LaBaren?" I happen to think that the Wiard is the best looking synthesizer being made. Thank God it doesn't look like a Moog. (or have a Moog filter for that matter;) mark C. Whitten wrote: >>I often wonder what both would look like with >>plainish MOTMesque panels. >> >Me too I'm afraid. >Is there any facility to request a plainer paint job Wiardwise. >Respect to the attitude that you should be original and true to yourself, >the celtic design just doesn't do it for me though. >Chris > > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >wiardgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [wiardgroup] Re: anamod [OT]
2002-04-04 by mark verbos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.