--- In wiardgroup@y..., mark verbos <a0284520@a...> wrote: > and according to Dan Slater, he has 3 of them. > mark > > Paul Schreiber wrote: > > >>>do you have one? > >>> > > > >According to Don Buchla, only 7 were ever made. > > > >Paul S. > > According to catalogues there were several different models. I don't know how many of each version actually were built, I only know photos of the 1602. 248 -1602 $ 1,550 -1606 $ 2,800 -3206 $ 3,250 -3210 $ 4,500 -0004 $ ? The first two digits describe the number of stages (i.e. double sliders in the potentiometer section; 2 panel units per 16 stages), the last two are for the number of sections labelled "programmed outputs" (1 panel unit per two sections - the 3210 would be 2,5 racks wide). There is always one control section (1 panel unit, in which per-stage-information is determined globally). The output sections can independently transform the slider-set main output voltage and time intervals to give various interpretations of "the sequence" at a time. For example they contain a voltage controlled time multiplier (similar to the halftime/ doubletime Sequantizer patch Grant recently described - MARF sequences from different output sections can beat against each other's timing); a descending ramp with a period equal to the interval time (simplest use: a simple decay envelope whose length always matches the tempo); controls for various stepping/ stage-addressing modes, etc. The MARF may be the most capable analog module, but also the most technically complicated and tedious to use. This kind of instrument could not but welcome the advance of digital technology. The software implementations of the MARF in the Touché/ 400/ 700 systems were more capable and more convenient to use (having non-volatile memory, higher time resolution, several available at a time). Sebastian Kuehnl __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Message
Re: 248 Buchla MARF - Discriminator ?!?
2002-03-15 by Sebastian Kuehnl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.